Home » Italy’s ‘Global Mediterranean’ Turns to the Indo-Pacific
World

Italy’s ‘Global Mediterranean’ Turns to the Indo-Pacific

This analysis, originally published by The Diplomat, examines Italy’s evolving Indo-Pacific posture through the lens of the “Global Mediterranean” concept. Written by Emanuele Rossi, Senior Analyst at Decode39, and Valbona Zeneli, Advisory Board Member at Decode39, the piece argues that Rome’s engagement with Japan and South Korea reflects a selective but strategic approach—anchored in economic security, defense-industrial cooperation, and regional connectivity—positioning Italy as a geopolitical and geoeconomic connector between the Indo-Pacific, Europe, and Africa rather than as a traditional regional power.

Italy is seeking to anchor its role through key partnerships across an increasingly interconnected geopolitical space, in which national and economic security overlap.

Key Takeaways:

  • Italy’s Indo-Pacific is an Indo-Mediterranean strategy, not a regional pivot. Rome is not “turning to Asia” but extending its Global Mediterranean logic eastward, treating the Indo-Pacific as a strategic continuation of the Mediterranean system where maritime security, trade routes, energy flows and industrial supply chains converge.

  • Japan is Italy’s anchor partner beyond Europe. The density of political engagement with Tokyo under Giorgia Meloni, the upgrade to a Special Strategic Partnership, and cooperation on GCAP signal that Italy sees Japan as the primary non-European node for defense interoperability, industrial co-production and technological autonomy.

  • Security engagement is selective but operationally credible. Italy compensates for limited force-projection capacity with high-value naval diplomacy and interoperability, exemplified by the Cavour carrier deployment with Japan’s maritime forces—embedding Italy into Indo-Pacific security architectures without permanent military overstretch.

  • Economic security drives the partnership as much as geopolitics. Cooperation with Japan and South Korea targets systemic vulnerabilities—critical minerals, semiconductors, AI and space—placing Italy within trusted supply-chain ecosystems linked to the U.S.-backed Pax Silica logic and reinforcing EU-Japan frameworks on co-development and resilience.

  • Italy acts as a connector across regions, not a balancer against China. Rome avoids overt confrontation with Beijing while deepening alignment with advanced democracies; through the Mattei Plan, the Lobito Corridor and EU coordination, Italy positions itself as a geo-economic bridge linking Indo-Pacific, Europe and Africa rather than as a frontline Indo-Pacific power.

The bottom line: “Selectivity, however, does not mean disengagement. Through naval diplomacy, defense and industrial cooperation, and targeted partnerships with Japan and South Korea, Italy is embedding itself in the Indo-Pacific’s evolving security and economic architecture in line with its capabilities and focusing where it can add value – prioritizing interoperability, industrial cooperation and political coordination across,” Emanuele and Valbona wrote.

Read the full analysis

Subscribe to our newsletter